Neighbors obsess and wring their hands over tree removal at the expense of solving all other problems. From 4 units to 22 units is a huge win. Planting 26 new maple trees is a huge win. NIMBYs are losing sight of the forest for the trees.
The NPR story (like so many others that pit preserving trees against building new homes) omits mention of the massive climate and tree preservation benefits of adding more homes in already-developed urban areas, as opposed to building in greenfield WUI areas.
The tree action people do realize that trees eventually get sick / grow old / die, right? The idea that we can ‘never’ make up for it is necessarily incorrect
Notice the virtue signaling parasites you play the race card every time they offer up housing based on skin color priorities are Exempted from the development concerns from the original tree weaponization and yet tree action never ever offers the conversational possibilities blocking off the road and redeveloping with homes and greenery as opposed to leaving the road and complaining about a neighbor wanting to build a Better Home that might have to tear down a tree that's already unhealthy because the road chokes it off so much that would justify blocking the road forever and 21st century redeveloping a resident pedestrian centric neighborhood instead of a car centric infrastructure that causes most of the global warming in the local neighbors who think that they can turn against their neighbor weaponizing the tree while continuing to drive through bothering everybody and conspiring to sabotage the comprehensive plan cuz they own a home and they don't want any more homes so that they can take advantage of the supply and demand squeezing and flip their double triple mortgage dilapidated inflated 20th century home for a quadruple mortgage at the expense of multitudes of younger generations need a better class and choice and home instead of habitat for humanity building low quality low level on the side of the road it's like more modern third world developers more poverty punishment properties virtue signaling their race-based priorities
Typical college pukes of privilege reading articulate bad policies while refusing to understand the truth becuz it's got a run on sentence after using the gdmn auto text voice activated button.fu and your English
Sigh..,College "puke" and retired teacher. Punctuation was established because it helps organize the presentation of thoughts into manageable chunks. Unfortunately your word salad does not communicate the information you wish to share clearly thereby reducing your potential audience. This means you're merely ranting into the void or in the vernacular, "pissing into the wind". I suggest learning more about your voice activation tool and see if you can fix the problem, David.
Neighbors obsess and wring their hands over tree removal at the expense of solving all other problems. From 4 units to 22 units is a huge win. Planting 26 new maple trees is a huge win. NIMBYs are losing sight of the forest for the trees.
It’s a huge win for some people. If you’re Rob Saka or Bruce Harrell, building any housing (especially affordable housing) is a huge loss.
The NPR story (like so many others that pit preserving trees against building new homes) omits mention of the massive climate and tree preservation benefits of adding more homes in already-developed urban areas, as opposed to building in greenfield WUI areas.
The tree action people do realize that trees eventually get sick / grow old / die, right? The idea that we can ‘never’ make up for it is necessarily incorrect
Notice the virtue signaling parasites you play the race card every time they offer up housing based on skin color priorities are Exempted from the development concerns from the original tree weaponization and yet tree action never ever offers the conversational possibilities blocking off the road and redeveloping with homes and greenery as opposed to leaving the road and complaining about a neighbor wanting to build a Better Home that might have to tear down a tree that's already unhealthy because the road chokes it off so much that would justify blocking the road forever and 21st century redeveloping a resident pedestrian centric neighborhood instead of a car centric infrastructure that causes most of the global warming in the local neighbors who think that they can turn against their neighbor weaponizing the tree while continuing to drive through bothering everybody and conspiring to sabotage the comprehensive plan cuz they own a home and they don't want any more homes so that they can take advantage of the supply and demand squeezing and flip their double triple mortgage dilapidated inflated 20th century home for a quadruple mortgage at the expense of multitudes of younger generations need a better class and choice and home instead of habitat for humanity building low quality low level on the side of the road it's like more modern third world developers more poverty punishment properties virtue signaling their race-based priorities
Well, I stopped reading your comment after the first run-on sentence.
Typical college pukes of privilege reading articulate bad policies while refusing to understand the truth becuz it's got a run on sentence after using the gdmn auto text voice activated button.fu and your English
Sigh..,College "puke" and retired teacher. Punctuation was established because it helps organize the presentation of thoughts into manageable chunks. Unfortunately your word salad does not communicate the information you wish to share clearly thereby reducing your potential audience. This means you're merely ranting into the void or in the vernacular, "pissing into the wind". I suggest learning more about your voice activation tool and see if you can fix the problem, David.